Nuntly vs Postmark

Looking for a Postmark alternative?

Fast API send latency, deep-stack unified observability, EU data hosting, and cost effective pricing. Same transactional focus, without the slow onboarding or expensive scaling.

Try Nuntly free

Free plan available. No credit card required.

At a glance

Postmark was founded in 2009 and acquired by ActiveCampaign in 2020. It is known for fast transactional email delivery, but its slow manual onboarding, lack of API request logs, absence of idempotency keys, no EU hosting, and expensive pricing at scale push developers toward modern alternatives. Nuntly matches that transactional focus with fast API latency, unified deep-stack observability, and cost effective pricing.

  • Both are focused on transactional email with strong delivery speed
  • Nuntly adds fast API latency, unified deep-stack observability, idempotent requests, scheduled sending, and EU data hosting
  • Postmark is one of the most expensive providers at scale, with slow onboarding and no plans for EU hosting
Key advantages

Why developers choose Nuntly over Postmark

The differences that matter most when choosing an email platform.

Fast API send latency

Optimized for speed at every volume tier. Every millisecond matters when you send transactional emails at scale.

Unified deep-stack observability

API logs, email flow, delivery events, and webhooks in a single unified view. Postmark has no API request logs and no event replay.

EU data hosting by default

All data stored and processed in Europe. Postmark has no plans to add EU servers.

Cost effective pricing

Bootstrap company with cost effective pricing. At 125k emails/mo, Nuntly costs from €68/mo vs Postmark's $130/mo.

Feature comparison

Feature by feature

A side-by-side look at what each platform offers.

Features

Nuntly

Recommended

Postmark

Deliverability

DKIM, SPF, and DMARC
Suppression list management
Shared IP reputation

Both platforms prioritize deliverability. Postmark has a strong reputation, but protects it at all costs: they would rather ban a paying customer than risk shared IP reputation, which can lead to sudden account suspensions.

API Performance

Fast API send latency

Nuntly is optimized for fast API send latency, which matters for high-throughput applications where every millisecond counts.

Advanced SDKs

TypeScript SDK
Java SDK
Built-in retry and error handling
Idempotent requests

Both offer TypeScript and Java SDKs. Postmark does not support idempotency keys, increasing the risk of duplicate sends during network failures. Nuntly SDKs include built-in retry logic and idempotent requests out of the box.

Developer Experience

REST API
API request logs
Full platform API
Instant onboarding

Postmark's API only returns an HTTP response with no request logs. Onboarding requires manual account approval that can take up to 24 hours. Postmark organizes sending around rigid Server/Message Stream abstractions. Nuntly offers instant access, full API request logs, and a flat domain-based model.

Security

EU data hosting
Encryption at rest
GDPR compliance by default

Postmark processes data in the US and has no plans to add servers in Europe. For GDPR-sensitive applications, this requires additional legal and compliance work. Nuntly hosts all data in Europe by default.

Observability

Real-time dashboard
Unified observability view
API request logs
Webhooks
Event replay

Postmark's API only returns an HTTP response with no request logs. Nuntly provides a unified view of API logs, email flow, delivery events, and webhooks in a single place, with event replay on every plan.

Cost Effective

Free plan
3,000 emails/mo
100 emails/mo
Bootstrap company
Cost effective

Postmark is widely considered one of the most expensive transactional email providers as you scale. At 125k emails/mo, Nuntly costs from €68/mo vs Postmark's $130/mo. Nuntly is a bootstrap company with cost effective pricing that includes observability and EU data hosting on all plans.

Sending Capabilities

Single and bulk sending
Scheduled sending
HTML and plain text

Postmark lacks native scheduled sending. If you need to queue an email for future delivery (password expiry reminders, digest emails), you must build scheduling yourself. Nuntly supports scheduled sending through the API with a simple scheduledAt parameter.

Last verified: 2026-02-08

Pricing

Pricing comparison

A side-by-side look at what each platform costs at different volumes.

Volume
Nuntly
Postmark
Free plan
3,000 emails/mo
100 emails/mo
10,000 emails/mo
€10/mo (Starter)
From $15/mo (Basic)
50,000 emails/mo
€16/mo (Starter)
From $66/mo (Platform)
125,000 emails/mo
From €68/mo (Scale)
From $130/mo (Platform)
1,500,000 emails/mo
€625/mo (Scale)
From $930/mo (Platform)
EU data hosting
All plans
Not available

Postmark is widely considered one of the most expensive transactional email providers. At every volume point, Nuntly is meaningfully cheaper. At 125k emails/mo, Nuntly costs from €68/mo compared to Postmark's $130/mo. At 1.5M emails/mo, Nuntly costs €625/mo vs Postmark's $930/mo. Nuntly also includes EU data hosting on all plans.

Prices as of 2026-02-08. Check each provider's website for the latest pricing.

Who is it for

Which platform fits your needs?

Different teams have different requirements. Here is an honest breakdown.

Choose Nuntly if you need

  • Teams that need fast API send latency at scale
  • Projects requiring unified deep-stack observability with API request logs
  • Teams that need EU data hosting and GDPR compliance
  • Organizations looking for cost effective pricing from a bootstrap company

Consider Postmark if you need

  • Teams that need inbound email processing alongside transactional sending
  • Projects where slow onboarding (up to 24h manual approval) and no idempotency keys are acceptable
  • Organizations comfortable with US-only data hosting and one of the most expensive pricing at scale
What customers say

Developers who switched

What teams say after moving to Nuntly.

We've used Mailgun and Postmark in the past, but when we switched to Nuntly, it was incredible. Finally a platform that truly understands developer concerns! The APIs feel natural, the SDK is intuitive and the observability lets us really see what's happening with our emails. We'll never go back to those legacy platforms.
Lucas Lampietti

Lucas Lampietti

CTO Java, Ekino

Nuntly delivered on all fronts for our business needs. Consistent deliverability ensures our emails reach customers reliably, while built-in security and compliance features give us full confidence. The platform dramatically improved our team's productivity and our developers love Nuntly.
Denis Barthelemy

Denis Barthelemy

CTO, Echo Analytics

Migration

Switch from Postmark in minutes

Most developers complete the migration in a single session.

1

Create your account

Sign up for free at nuntly.com. No credit card required. Unlike Postmark, there is no approval process to start sending.

2

Verify your domain

Add your sending domain. Postmark uses Server and Message Stream concepts. In Nuntly, you verify a domain once and send from any address on that domain.

3

Migrate your templates

If you use Postmark templates, render them to HTML and pass them to the Nuntly API. Nuntly accepts raw HTML, so any template engine works.

4

Swap the SDK

Replace the Postmark SDK with @nuntly/sdk. Map Postmark sendEmail() calls to nuntly.emails.send(). The fields are similar: From, To, Subject, HtmlBody become from, to, subject, html.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about switching email providers.

More comparisons

Ready to get started?

Ship emails,
Not infrastructure

Trusted by Echo Analytics, DiliTrust, Ogury, and 100+ developer teams.

Free plan available. No credit card required.